This oversight plan is filed pursuant to clause 2(d) of rule X of the Rules of the
House of Representatives which requires that, not later than February 15 of the first
session of a Congress, each standing committee of the House shall adopt its oversight plan
for that Congress.
Introduction
The oversight responsibilities of the Committee on Armed Services will be conducted
primarily within the context of the committee's consideration of the annual defense
authorization bill. This legislation covers the breadth of the operations of the
Department of Defense (DOD) as well as a significant portion of the annual operating
budget of the Department of Energy. The annual national defense function budget of
approximately $270 billion involves millions of military and civilian personnel, thousands
of facilities, and hundreds of agencies, departments, and commands located throughout the
world. The committee will continue to perform general oversight on the structure and
management of the Department of Defense and related topics.
The committee conducts continuous oversight of laws, programs, and agencies under
permanent authority in Titles 10 (Armed Forces), 37 (Pay and Allowances), 42 (Atomic
Energy), and 50 and 50 Appendix (War and National Defense), United States Code, which are
within its jurisdiction.
The jurisdiction of the committee, pursuant to clause 2(c) of rule X of the Rules of
the House of Representatives is as follows:
(1) Ammunition depots; forts; arsenals; Army, Navy, and Air Force reservations and
establishments.
(2) Common defense generally.
(3) Conservation, development, and use of naval petroleum and oil shale reserves.
(4) The Department of Defense generally, including the Departments of the Army, Navy,
and Air Force generally.
(5) Interoceanic canals generally, including measures relating to the maintenance,
operation, and administration of interoceanic canals.
(6) Merchant Marine Academy, and State Merchant Marine Academies.
(7) Military applications of nuclear energy.
(8) Tactical intelligence and intelligence related activities of the Department of
Defense.
(9) Armed Services aspects of merchant marine, including financial assistance for the
construction and operation of vessels, the maintenance of the U.S. shipbuilding and ship
repair industrial base, cabotage, cargo preference and merchant marine officers and seamen
as these matters relate to the Armed Services.
(10) Pay, promotion, retirement, and other benefits and privileges of members of the
armed services.
(11) Scientific research and development in support of the armed services.
(12) Selective service.
(13) Size and composition of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force.
(14) Soldiers' and sailors' homes.
(15) Strategic and critical materials necessary for the common defense.
In addition to its legislative jurisdiction and general oversight function, the
committee has special oversight functions with respect to international arms control and
disarmament and military dependents' education pursuant to clause 3(g) of rule X of the
Rules of the House of Representatives.
Oversight Agenda
The committee will continue its oversight and assessment of threats to U.S. national
security and U.S. interests. The committee will regularly assess national security threats
and challenges as it begins consideration of the fiscal year 2000 and fiscal year 2001
defense budget requests. This effort will involve appropriate oversight hearings with the
Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the individual service
Secretaries and Chiefs of Staff, regional Commanders-in-Chief, other officials of the
Department of Defense and the military departments, officials of the Central Intelligence
Agency and other defense-related intelligence agencies, and officials of the Department of
Energy. In addition, the committee will invite the views and perspectives of outside
experts in academia, industry, associations and those in private life on these matters.
The oversight agenda below, unless otherwise noted, is designed to serve primarily in
support of the consideration by the committee and, ultimately, the House of the annual
defense authorization bill. The issues identified below are expected to be on-going areas
of oversight activity throughout the 106th Congress. In addition, the committee will
continue to pay particular attention to the mandates placed on executive departments and
agencies by Public Law 103-62, the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. The
committee will examine closely the progress of the Department of Defense, the military
departments, and the Department of Energy in implementing Public Law 103-62, to include
the use of performance-based budgeting techniques and five-year strategic planning
documents, for programs within its jurisdiction.
Given the unique nature of national security issues and related oversight of the armed
forces, the committee reiterates again that the oversight agenda is subject to the
emergence of unforeseen events that may displace previously planned activities. Such
oversight requirements significantly complicate the ability to prescribe with great
accuracy or specificity the entire oversight agenda of the committee. For instance,
Congressional oversight of defense activities has historically involved in-depth
assessments of military operations and other major events that are generally difficult to
predict in advance. Past examples of this category of oversight include the bombing of the
Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, the reflagging of Kuwaiti tankers in the Persian Gulf,
Operation Just Cause in Panama, the Desert Shield/Storm deployment and operation, the
peacekeeping deployment to Somalia to name just a few. As recently as the 104th Congress,
areas of intensive oversight conducted by the committee that could not have been
reasonably anticipated at the outset of the Congress included the deployment of U.S.
ground forces to Bosnia and the terrorist attack against U.S. military facilities in
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The breadth and demands of such reviews are such that they can
dominate committee and staff resources, sometimes at the expense of other pre-planned
activities. The continuing unsettled nature of the post-Cold War world is such that the
committee fully expects that this type of event-driven oversight will continue to be
required and will inevitably have an impact upon other planned oversight activities.
In addition, the committee has a long tradition of translating oversight activities
into prescriptive legislative action as reflected in past comprehensive efforts to reform
the military retirement system, the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization
Act, the Federal Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act, and the Federal Acquisition
Streamlining Act of 1994, and the Federal Acquisition Reform Act of 1996. The
committee will continue to maintain a strong linkage between formal oversight efforts and
legislative initiatives.
In addition to the above, the following specific areas and subjects are identified for
special attention during the 106th Congress:
Acquisition Reform
The committee will continue to monitor closely the proper and full implementation of
the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994, the Federal Acquisition Reform Act of
1996, and other recent reforms of the federal acquisition system. In addition, the
committee will continue to evaluate proposals to further reform the military procurement
process to achieve greater efficiencies and economies. The committee will continue to
cooperate and coordinate fully with the Committee on Government Reform in these matters of
shared jurisdiction and interest.
Base Closure and Realignment
Particular attention will be given, but not limited, to the following: a continuing
examination of the cost and savings associated with base realignment and closure actions
taken in 1988, 1991, 1993, and 1995; examination of the impact of base realignment and
closure actions on affected local communities, including the effects of Administration
policy and statutory requirements concerning base reuse, disposal, and community
adjustment assistance; examination of previous base realignment and closure actions and
their impact on readiness and future force modernization; continuing oversight of the
management of the base realignment and closure process by the military services.
Environmental Programs
Particular attention will be given, but not limited, to the following: assessment of
current federal, state, and local environmental compliance, remediation, and restoration
requirements imposed on the Department of Defense, the military services and the
Department of Energy; examination of current and planned funding requirements for
environmental programs of the DOD and DOE, including an assessment of the cost
effectiveness of such programs; and examination of the diversion of military training and
operations and maintenance funds to meet unfunded environmental requirements and the
impact such diversion may have on training and readiness. Additionally, the committee will
continue to cooperate and coordinate fully with the Committee on Commerce and other
committees of jurisdiction on reauthorization of the Superfund program.
Force Readiness
A continuing principal focus of the committee during the 106th Congress will be to
assess the readiness of the armed services and the adequacy of the Administration's
defense spending priorities to support sustained readiness and modernization of our
military forces. Particular attention will also be given, but not limited, to the
following: an examination of the current state of readiness of the armed services; an
assessment of congressionally revised methods of measuring the readiness of military
units; a continuing examination of the training required for the maintenance of a high
state of readiness and whether training requirements are properly funded; examination of
the impact of the high pace of deployments on service personnel and their families;
reevaluation of current policy supporting officer and enlisted recruiting, accessions,
training, promotions, separations, and retirements; assessment of pay, compensation, and
other benefits of military service; a continuing assessment of recruitment and retention
policies and programs of the military services; and an assessment of the condition of
wartime medical readiness.
Industrial and Technological Base
Particular attention will be given, but not limited, to the following: assessment of
current budget and policy priorities on the maintenance of the defense industrial and
technology base; assessment of the ramifications of mergers and acquisitions in the
defense industry on the development of future weapons systems; assessment of dual-use
technology programs; examination of the current defense laboratory system; assessment of
the role of defense funding for university research in the maintenance of the technology
base.
Information Assurance
Particular attention will be given, but not limited to the following: an assessment of
measures undertaken by the Department of Defense to ensure year 2000 compliance of DOD
information technology and national security systems, including those measures required to
ensure the continuity of essential operations for the critical functions of DOD and the
military departments; an assessment of the measures being taken by the Department of
Defense to reduce the vulnerability of information technology systems to unauthorized
access and use, the theft of information, and new forms of informational warfare and
terrorism.
Intelligence
The committee will continue to cooperate and coordinate with the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence on tactical intelligence matters and intelligence-related
activities of the Department of Defense in the course of its annual oversight of the
intelligence community and the authorization of appropriations for intelligence activities
shared by the two committees.
Merchant Marine
Particular attention will be given, but not limited, to the following: examination of
current programs to maintain the U.S. flag merchant fleet and its role in strategic and
sustainment sealift; the condition of the National Defense Reserve Fleet and its
capability to meet surge requirements, and oversight of the implementation of Public Law
104-239, the Maritime Security Act of 1996 by the United States Maritime Administration
and the United States Transportation Command; examination of the ability of U.S. shipyards
to transition to a combination of defense and non-defense ship construction and the role
of the trade agreement concerning shipbuilding among member states of the Organization on
Economic Cooperation and Development in affecting that transition.
The committee will also continue its oversight of the Panama Canal Commission and the
transfer of its functions and assets to the Republic of Panama as specified by treaty.
Military Applications of Nuclear Energy
Particular attention will be given, but not limited, to the following: continuing
modernization and maintenance of U.S. defense nuclear structure in support of Armed
Services requirements; assessment of possible effects of a nuclear test ban, in whole or
in part, on the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; examination of the
restructuring of the nuclear facility workforce; assessment of options concerning the
disposition of plutonium and highly enriched uranium; examination of future national
stockpile requirements for tritium; and oversight of organizational issues affecting the
Department of Energy.
Military Modernization
Particular attention will be given, but not limited to the following: a continuing
examination of projected military equipment modernization on military capability; tactical
aviation and bomber force structure, including review of on-going assessments by the
Department of Defense on the appropriate mix of deep attack weapons; shipbuilding
requirements to maintain a 300-ship naval capability; anti-submarine and mine warfare;
strategic lift; oversight of research and development and procurement of major weapons
systems, particularly tactical aircraft and missile procurement. The committee will also
devote particular oversight attention to current plans for conducting research and
development on missile defense systems; plans for deploying national missile defenses and
advanced theater missile defenses for forward deployed U.S. military forces and those of
our allies.
Morale, Welfare and Recreation Programs
Particular attention will be given, but not limited, to the following: oversight of
Morale, Welfare, and Recreation programs; examination of military exchanges and
commissaries oversight of nonappropriated fund construction programs and other
nonappropriated fund instrumentalities.
National Military Strategy and Force Structure
Particular attention will be given, but not limited, to the following: a continuing
examination of the strategic and tactical assumptions supporting the national military
strategy of the United States; a continuing assessment of the role of contingency
operations in the execution of the national military strategy and the force structure
required to sustain such operations; an examination of the technological, doctrinal, and
other factors affecting the long-term transformation of the conduct of military
operations; examination of initiatives to enhance Guard and Reserve forces and the
integration of active and reserve components, including a review of active and reserve
general officer authorizations and distributions; review of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff-combatant commands military requirements, examination of roles and
missions of the armed services, and their implications for modernization requirements and
the development of major weapons systems.
Organization and Management of the Department of Defense
The committee will continue its review of the Department of Defense infrastructure to
insure progress in meeting established downsizing and streamlining goals. The committee
considers these issues a top priority in light of the recalcitrance of the Department with
respect to past Congressional direction and compliance with statutory mandates in this
area. Specifically, the committee will focus on downsizing of the Office of the Secretary
of Defense, Defense agencies and support activities, the staffs of the military
departments, and unified commands. The committee will similarly pursue options to decrease
the cost associated with the defense service support infrastructure in an effort to
redirect these budgetary resources to underfunded modernization and readiness accounts.
People and Quality of Life
The committee will continue to address critical issues and programs supporting the
quality of life for military personnel and their families and the effect of those programs
ultimately on military readiness. Particular attention will be given, but not limited to
the following: examination of the conditions of facilities where service personnel and
their families live and work, including the investment strategy of the Department of
Defense for maintaining adequate facilities; assessment of the cost, accessibility, and
quality of peacetime military health care, including the adequacy and relevance of
military health care facilities construction to the health care objectives of the
Department of Defense; examination of research and health care issues related to the care
of veterans of the Persian Gulf War; assessment of the policies, procedures and systems of
the Department of Defense and the military departments related to sexual misconduct;
examination of family support programs, including child care and dependent education;
review of the current quality and adequacy of the military family housing supply; review
of the current quality and adequacy of barracks, bachelor enlisted quarters, and
dormitories; oversight of the implementation of the Military Housing Privatization
Initiative (section 2801 of Public Law 104-106, the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1996); and examination of the backlog in the repair and maintenance of
military housing.
Technology Transfers and Export Controls
The committee will continue to conduct a careful examination of the current U.S. export
control regime and its effectiveness in preventing the transfer of sensitive
military-related technologies to potential adversaries. In particular, the committee will
focus its efforts on the following: evaluating the impact of U.S. policy regarding the
export of sophisticated encryption products on U.S. national security; conducting
oversight of the implementation of legislative requirements related to the export of high
performance computers (so-called "supercomputers") contained in Public Law
105-85, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998; examining the results
and impact of the licensing jurisdiction changes related to the export of U.S. satellites
mandated by Public Law 105-261, the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1999; and assessing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the
Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns With the
Peoples Republic of China with a view toward developing appropriate legislative
remedies to prevent the unauthorized or dangerous transfer of military-related U.S.
technology to China. In these and other export control-related areas, the committee will
continue to cooperate as appropriate with the Committee on International Relations and the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.