|
STATEMENT
OF JOHN A. GORDON
UNDER SECRETARY OF ENERGY AND ADMINISTRATOR
FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY
NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JUNE 26, 2002
Introduction
Thank you, Mr. Chairman for having me here
today. This
is an exciting time: the United States is on the
cusp of establishing a new Government Agency
that will have sweeping responsibilities.
It will enable us to more effectively
respond to today's threats, through a
streamlined and coordinated institution that
will greatly enhance our ability to respond
quickly, decisively, and where necessary, before
threats against our homeland materialize.
In short, we are on the verge of making
history. It's
critical that we get it right.
I want to state in no uncertain terms that
like the Department of Energy itself, the
National Nuclear Security Administration is
fully committed to continuing support of the
homeland security mission, and the successful
establishment of the Department of Homeland
Security. We recognize that this will require restructuring and
relocation of critical assets now under the
stewardship of the NNSA.
We are prepared to support these shifts
in responsibilities, and indeed, to do what is
necessary to make any transfer of
responsibilities as smooth and painless as
possible.
There is an enormous amount of experience
and expertise now residing in DOE/NNSA that will
be vital to the success of the new Department.
Our Science and Technology assets and
capabilities have been applied to homeland
security problems long before last September;
and it is certainly the case that such
contributions became more focused and
accelerated after that day.
We've accelerated the PROTECT subway
demonstration, which will help provide chemical
protection to the U.S. population. We deployed a prototype biodetection capability at the winter
Olympics. We
have greatly increased our work with the U.S.
customs and coast guard with radiation and
nuclear technology - specific areas that will
directly benefit the new Department.
DOE/NNSA is committed to ensuring that
its assets can continue to provide enabling
Science and Technology in support of homeland
security and counter terrorism mission needs.
The capabilities we have are exemplary; by
creating the Department of Homeland Security,
the United States will be able to utilize all
the better these assets.
By establishing a clear prioritization of
needs, defining a cohesive mission focus, and
integrating these capabilities in ways that will
eliminate stovepipes, the United States will
strengthen its ability to respond to today's
threats and those of the future.
I want specifically to discuss a number of
capabilities currently residing in the
Department of Energy that will be support or be
transferred to the new Department. I want to
describe them, discuss their role in supporting
the homeland security mission, and note the
unique assets they each bring to the table in
supporting the new Department.
They are the DOE/NNSA emergency response
capability; our technology research and
development assets; our nuclear detection
assets; and advanced scientific research efforts
related directly to counter terrorism.
Emergency Response
The
Department of Homeland Security will assume the
mission to prevent terrorist attacks within the
United States, to reduce America's vulnerability
to terrorism, and to minimize the damage and
recover from attacks that may occur.
DOE/NNSA capabilities to respond to a
nuclear/radiological accident or incident will
be strengthened by this identification of one
Federal Government agency with its primary
mission of Homeland Security.
DOE/NNSA
marshals highly trained and unique scientific
and technical expertise in support of the Lead
Federal Agency (LFA).
This expertise is drawn from across the
nuclear weapons complex and is composed of 29
full time and ~118 part time Federal officials;
29 full time and ~ 320 part time National
Laboratory staff; and, 11 full time and ~450
part time contractor staff = 70 full time, 870
part time.
Although
nearly 900 individuals are involved with the
nuclear/radiological incident response teams,
through extensive matrixing and leveraging of
resources, the cost to the government is only
equivalent to 212 full time employees.
This matrixing makes the response
programs stronger and keeps the costs very low.
The response teams are staffed with
volunteers who, for the vast majority, work on
ensuring the safety and reliability of the
nation's nuclear stockpile day in and day out.
These volunteers respond to staff a
response team when called, much like a volunteer
firefighter.
The
Nuclear/Radiological Incident Response Programs
DOE/NNSA
is prepared to respond immediately anywhere in
the world with a variety of unique response
capabilities.
The
response capability most often heard of is the
Nuclear Emergency Support Team (NEST), which
provides technical assistance to the Lead
Federal Agency (LFA).
NEST is our program for preparing and
equipping specialized response teams to deal
with the technical aspects of nuclear or
radiological terrorism.
NEST capabilities include search and
identification of nuclear materials, diagnostics
and assessment of suspected nuclear devices,
technical operations in support of render safe
procedures, and packaging for transport to final
disposition.
Response teams vary in size from a five
person technical advisory team to a tailored
deployment of dozens of searchers and scientists
who can locate and then conduct or support
technical operations on a suspected nuclear
device. NEST personnel and equipment are ready to deploy worldwide at
all times.
A
Nuclear/Radiological Advisory Team deploys as
part of an FBI led Domestic Emergency Support
Team (DEST) or as part of a State Department led
Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST) for an
incident overseas to provide nuclear scientific
and technical advice to the LFA.
If
the location of a suspected nuclear or
radiological device is not known, search
operations may be required.
NEST search teams are routinely
configured to detect and locate a radiological
source using a variety of methods ranging from
hand-carried to vehicle-mounted search
equipment.
The basic building block for search
operations is the Search Response Team.
The Search Response Team stays ready to
deploy on either civilian or military aircraft.
Upon arrival on-scene, the Search
Response Team can begin searching immediately
or, can equip and train local responders, who
are already familiar with the search area.
When
a device is located, the specific resolution is
dependent upon the political, technical, and
tactical situation.
The ultimate goal in resolving a nuclear
terrorism crisis is to keep the terrorist device
from producing a nuclear yield.
DOE/NNSA Joint Technical Operations Teams
have been designated to work with military
explosive ordinance disposal (EOD) teams during
all phases of the crisis response.
This approach also draws upon the
personnel and equipment resources of the
Accident Response Group (ARG).
The ARG mission is to manage the
resolution of accidents or significant incidents
involving nuclear weapons that are in DOE's
custody at the time of the accident or incident.
The
Aerial Measuring System (AMS) aircraft carry
radiation detection systems that provide
real-time measurements of ground and airborne
contamination, even very low radiation levels.
AMS can also provide detailed aerial
photographs and multi-spectral imagery and
analysis of an accident site.
AMS provides a rapid response to
radiological emergencies with helicopters and
fixed-wing aircraft equipped to detect and
measure radioactive material deposited on the
ground and to sample and track airborne
radiation.
The
Atmospheric Release Advisory Capability (ARAC)
role in an emergency begins when a nuclear,
chemical, or hazardous material is released into
the atmosphere.
ARAC's main function is to provide near
real-time assessments of the consequences of
actual or potential radiation releases by
modeling the movement of hazardous plumes to
provide emergency response officials with the
vital immediate information they need to rapidly
evaluate airborne and ground contamination
projections and thus effectively protect people
and the environment.
Along
with many other assets, the response
capabilities I have described above are clearly
critical to any domestic response to a
nuclear/radiological incident.
Creation of a cabinet level Homeland
Security agency holds promise for dramatic
acceleration of improved capabilities against
domestic threats.
We in the DOE/NNSA are committed to the
success of this new Department, and will work to
facilitate it.
NNSA
Nonproliferation and Verification Research
Development Program
The NNSA Nonproliferation and Verification
Research and Development Program conducts
applied research, development, testing, and
evaluation and of technologies that lead to
prototype demonstrations and resultant detection
systems, strengthening the U.S. response to
current and projected threats to national
security worldwide posed by the proliferation of
nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and
the diversion of special nuclear material.
The R&D program is the technical base
that provides operational organizations with
innovative systems and technologies to satisfy
their nonproliferation and counter-terrorism
mission responsibilities.
For FY 2003, the Non-Proliferation and
Verification Research and Development Program
has four major elements:
·
Nuclear
explosion monitoring, which will remain within
the Department of Energy
·
Chemical
and Biological National Security, which will be
transferred in its entirety to the Department of
Homeland Security
·
Proliferation
Detection, and
·
Supporting
Activities
Within
the proliferation detection program is an
element on nuclear smuggling that will be
transferred to the Department of Homeland
Security. Proliferation
detection has aspects that support both
nonproliferation and homeland security.
Those elements that can be disaggregated
and identified as supporting homeland security
will be transferred to the new Department.
Where the activity supports both the
homeland security and non-proliferation
functions, we will examine such arrangements as
joint programs.
The Administration's proposed
legislation gives the President the necessary
flexibility to provide for joint operation.
Let me describe those functions that will
be transferred, after which I will return to the
subject of long-term coordination.
Major
Activities Identified for Transfer
Within,
the Nonproliferation and Verification Research
and Development Program, the Chemical and
Biological National Security Program and the
nuclear smuggling detection activity fall
squarely into the Homeland Security mission and
thus have been designated for transfer in their
entirety. The first Chemical and Biological National Security Program
develops and applies detection technologies
entirely for domestic homeland mission
requirements, such as a prototype biological
detection system used at the Salt Lake City
Olympics and a prototype chemical detection
system currently being installed in Washington
D.C.'s metro system; and the nuclear smuggling
detection activity directly supports the U.S.
homeland nuclear detection requirements, such as
a nuclear detection system designed for regional
deployment, for example around a major city.
These activities clearly fall within the
mission area of Homeland Security and represent
a necessary and prudent step. Now, let me describe to you in a bit more detail what both of
these activities do.
Chemical
and Biological National Security Program
The
Chemical and Biological National Security
Program works to develop technologies and
systems to improve the U.S. capability to
prepare for and respond to domestic chemical and
biological threats
against civilian populations, complementing
DOD's focus on the battlefield and military
installations.
As part its primary nuclear science and
technology mission, NNSA and the National
Laboratories have developed extensive
capabilities in chemistry, biology, and
materials and engineering sciences that form the
basis for the NNSA chemical and biological
national security program.
We have conducted research on the
biological foundations necessary to establish
signatures of biological threat agents and
develop assays certified by the Centers for
Disease Control for those agents, which are
applied to develop detectors.
NNSA has conducted demonstration projects
of prototype detector capabilities in
partnership with other agencies that have
operational missions, such as the systems I just
mentioned that have been developed and applied
for the Olympics and the Washington Metro, to
illustrate possible system approaches for
population protection.
We are now working to expand the number
of signatures and assays of biological agents
that we can detect with increased sensitivity,
and to improve public health response through
the CDC. The
next generation of biodetectors will be more
autonomous with capability to detect a much
wider range of agents, which will enable public
health agencies to rapidly move to treat
affected people.
Homeland
Security Nuclear Smuggling Activities
The
nuclear smuggling component of our proliferation
detection program also squarely fits within
homeland security and will be transferred.
NNSA and the National Laboratories, with
their nuclear weapons program experience, have
unique insight into nuclear proliferation
activities - the facilities and infrastructure
that would be necessary and the observable
signatures of nuclear weapon development
activity - and the capability to develop
technical solutions for the U.S. government to
detect and characterize such proliferation
activities in their early stages. In this program, NNSA has worked closely with homeland
security agencies, including U.S. Customs, U.S.
Coast Guard, and the Departments of
Transportation and Justice to apply this
technical base to detection of nuclear weapons
and materials at U.S. borders.
We have previously conducted
demonstrations with these agencies of radiation
detection methods at an international border
station, a port, a rail yard, and airport
personnel and baggage handling facilities.
With many of these agencies becoming part
of the new Department, it is a good fit for the
R&D applications to counter nuclear
smuggling to be transferred to the Department of
Homeland Security.
Coordination
with Homeland Security
These transfers are both prudent and
reinforcing of the efforts of Homeland Security
and the NNSA to fight WMD terrorism.
With the transfer of these programmatic
responsibilities to the Department of Homeland
Security, it will be critically important that
the new Department maintain the commitment to
support this technical base at the National
Laboratories, so that the capability and the
scientific atmosphere to pursue high risk,
long-term research be encouraged in spite of the
need to focus on short-term requirements for
homeland security.
Only through such investment will the
scientific and technical capability exist to
meet the needs for innovative solutions to
future homeland security problems.
With respect to the remainder of the
proliferation detection program, no matter how
the responsibilities are finally apportioned,
the research will be of value to both
departments.
This is inherent in the broad nature of
the research at the National Laboratories.
Thus it will be important for us to work
together closely so that both our
nonproliferation and homeland security efforts
will continue to benefit from the unparalleled
capabilities of the National Laboratories.
NNSA pledges to work closely with the
Department of Homeland Security so that our
research and development program efforts will be
mutually reinforcing.
Nuclear Threat Assessment and Trafficking
in Nuclear Materials
The
Department of Energy's Nuclear Assessment
Program was founded in April 1977 to provide a
national capability to accurately and swiftly
assess the credibility of communicated threats
of nuclear terrorism.
The Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory (LLNL) was chosen to lead this unique
effort. Since
September 1978, the Nuclear Assessment Program
has been used to assess the credibility of over
60 nuclear extortion threats, 25 nuclear reactor
threats, 20 non‑nuclear extortion threats
and approximately 650 cases involving the
reported or attempted illicit sale of nuclear
materials.
DOE views the illicit trafficking of
nuclear materials as an advance indicator of
terrorism, most likely against the United States
and close allies.
This
operational capability currently consists of a
small group of professionals who are
collectively knowledgeable in nuclear explosives
design and fabrication, nuclear reactor
operations and safeguards, radioactive materials
and hazards, linguistics analysis, behavioral
analysis and profiling, as well as terrorist
tactics and operations.
The assessors are organized into
specialty teams and operate in secure facilities
at each of the three participating DOE
contractor sites.
An assessment Coordination and
Communications Center at LLNL directs
credibility assessment operations for the DOE
and provides a single point of contact for
federal crisis managers during emergency
operations.
When
activated, the DOE-based threat credibility
assessment teams perform comprehensive
technical, operational and behavioral
assessments of communicated nuclear threats at
the start of an actual or perceived emergency.
Since communicated nuclear threats are a serious
violation of federal law, the FBI is the lead
federal agency. Decision-makers at the FBI, in concert with their
counterparts at the DOE and elsewhere, determine
the necessary follow-up actions to be taken and
the time urgency of response based on the
credibility assessment reports and other
considerations.
By completing high-quality
"front-end" assessments, unnecessary and
costly emergency responses can be avoided while
appropriate response can occur in more serious
or disturbing cases.
Selected
elements of the Nuclear Assessment Program are
routinely used to provide DOE technical support
to the law enforcement, diplomatic, and
intelligence communities.
Major support activities include
real-time assessments of nuclear black market
transactions, ranging from attempted sales and
buys of nuclear materials to reported thefts and
seizures of material.
In each case, a written assessment is
transmitted to the referring agency.
These reports include assessment
conclusions on the authenticity of the alleged
material, counter terrorism analyses, radiation
and toxicity hazards associated with assessed
material, linkages to prior cases, and
recommendations for follow-up actions. In select
instances, program experts are called upon to
deploy to the scene of alleged nuclear
trafficking activity to assist local
authorities, or provide other in-field help
based on the particulars of the case.
In situations where actual seized nuclear
material is available, the LLNL Forensic Science
Center is used to analyze the material for NAP.
Like
its companion nuclear threat assessment
activity, this DOE program provides accurate and
rapid analytical products.
It can also provide in-field operational
response, real-time technical advice and
assistance, and state-of-the-art laboratory
forensic support to various U.S. Government
consumers, based on the issue at hand.
Since Program inception, the Nuclear
Assessment Program has developed close and
working relationships with its counter-terrorism
counterparts in Customs, State, FBI, DIA, CIA,
and others in the nonproliferation community.
The Program also provides expert technical
support to law enforcement and others for
Special Event Preparedness, on-scene technical
support, and national and international
training.
Since
9/11 the Nuclear Assessment Program has
performed approximately 70 assessment products
involving communicated nuclear threats, reports
of illicit trafficking of nuclear materials, and
special analysis reports for law enforcement and
intelligence components.
Through its function of rapid-turnaround
nuclear assessments, this national asset
provided immeasurable support to all government
agencies tasked with separating critical from
non-critical information in the aftermath of
9/11. The entirety of the effort of the Nuclear Assessment Program
has been to safeguard the Homeland from nuclear
terrorism.
On
a final note, there has been some confusion
regarding Lawrence Livermore role with regard to
the new department.
The topic of work at Livermore, let me
note that I support fully the concept of
locating the new Department's main research
facility at Lawrence Livermore, with satellite
centers of excellence located at other national
laboratories.
It will create a campus-like environment
where scientists will be dedicated, full-time,
to thinking about homeland security, and it will
allow for direct interaction with the expertise
that resides at the other DOE labs as well as
other labs throughout the federal government.
It's good for DOE and it's good for
the Department of Homeland Security.
Conclusion
I
want to reiterate in no uncertain terms:
The National Nuclear Security
Administration supports fully the transfer of
the programs noted in Section 302(2) of the bill
under discussion.
The details of what would be included in
the legislative package were worked out directly
with my office.
These programs are a natural fit for the
Department of Homeland Security, whose primary
mission is the critical task of protecting the
United States from catastrophic terrorism.
DOE/NNSA will also work to ensure that
its assets can continue to contribute enabling
science and technology in support of DHS mission
needs.
Obviously,
that is a goal that I am pleased to support
wholeheartedly.
I believe that the Bill as being
discussed goes a long way toward its
realization.
Thank
you, and I look forward to any questions you may
have.
|